|
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 378]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
Tuesday, December
25, 1888
8 P. M. W. working over his notebook. Light up full, room very warm. The day mild and clear.
How had he spent his Christmas? "Oh without variety: there can be no
variety for a man situated as I am here: I am always much as you see me here now." He had
read and written somewhat—"started a letter for Doctor Bucke to
be finished and sent off to-morrow." Had he had any visitors?
"Yes—a few: only a few: Mr. Corning was here, and with him a
young man, an Englishman—from the south of England somewhere—Rathbone by
name." He paused and looked at me. I must have looked my ignorance. "Perhaps this will point the way for you. You remember the man who spoke about the nude in
art? I used his speech: it is there in Specimen Days." I assented. "Well, it was his son: and a real handsome fellow he was, too—even you would admit
that." I asked laughing: "Why do you say 'even' me?"
"After the way you and Tom received my mention
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page figure 008]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 379]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
of some one last evening I felt I had to be careful what I said,
what I tied to." Then he continued: "He was really
handsome—one of the Englishmen you cannot help liking: a bit dressy, washed, almost
dandyish—yet not, either: very enthusiastic—might call it soft-soapish:
but very sincere, no doubt, in some measure. We must remember that all the society fellows
have that failing—that peculiarity: the desire to say, do, think, graceful
things." Had Rathbone any personal knowledge of L. of G.? "I do not
think so: he did not talk as if he had." Had his father? "I do not
know: I know nothing about him further than the speech itself." "Rathbone was bright:
wanted to talk over matters literary, scientific, political, on none of which did I feel like
descanting or would have descanted if I had felt well: they are subjects I always avoid
discussing."
On a pile of papers an opened autograph album. W.'s name with date scrawled across a big full
page. I pointed to it. "That is a dangerous
precedent"—which made him laugh heartily. "So it
is—generally: but this is for a special person. A lady came here the other day to
get a copy of November Boughs: Eddy received her, waited on her: she left this book with him:
the idea being, when I was found in good condition to present it to me for my signature. Eddy
is very intuitive—knows how to fend, to ward off: all that—but gets names
wrong. I found when I got hold of the book once that this Miss Elwell was a friend of my
sister's—lives somewhere off in Jersey—is a school teacher: not a mean
one—of some prominence, I think: not very young, though a miss"—here
he laughed: "I would not like to say that to her, though I can say it to
you"—pursuing the subject: "Of course I conform in a case
like that: Miss Elwell is a reader—a bright woman."
I told him how good I felt over his inscription in my copy of the big book. "Ah! you like it?"
"Yes."
"So do I!—and what a trifle it is!—the expression of
an obligation—nothing more: in fact, the obligation not half said—not at
all said." I put in: "I did not accept it that way:
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 380]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
I took it in the camerado spirit." W. then: "Ah! how much better that is. Such a debt can never be paid for in money, in
confessions." Spoke of checks for printers and binders—did so voluntarily. "I must make them out: I want to settle the bills: I have a very convenient
way when feeling the least out of kelter of dropping all the world's affairs—even
the part that belongs to me to attend to." I suggested going to see McKay now the holiday
season was over and he was approachable. W. asked me to get him a copy of The Publisher's
Weekly containing a reproduction of the November Boughs frontispiece. Inquired if he had "adopted" the new pocketbook. "Yes indeed,
fully: and here 's the other in testimony"—lifting up
the old book from the table. "I did not like to throw this
away—it has done me long service—it has done its part well: I have some
sentiment in connection with it." Then further: ""You take
it—use it if you care to. What a history it has—if written, if told! Not a
tale of money alone, but of notes, cards, memorabilia—the hasty records of many
wanderings about. I have carried it many, many, years—have had it on my person at
all times: indeed I think I must have carried it from before the War—certainly from
the Washington period. I came up once—I used to come through Philadelphia every now
and then, on the way to see my dear mother: some one said to me: 'If you want
a book—a book of which you may be cocksure—go there'—naming
a place up Seventh street near Sherman's—where Sherman is now."
Had he read more of the Tolstoy book? "I have finished
it—every word of it: was impatient to do it—profoundly interested." I
felt that he began to see the reasons for my warm espousal of Tolstoy. Was the book not vivid?
"I should say so!—rich: if I had to criticise it I should say,
too strong, too vivid." Yet it was "fascinating beyond words."
"The translation itself was a work of finest art: Tolstoy, so far as I
see, is here for the first time fitly rendered in English. I wrote the Doctor about it this
eve-
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 381]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
ning: put it in the letter there: he is always on the qui vive
for matters of that sort—new books, worthy books, remarkable books." But where
was the book? "It has got lost somewhere among these odds and ends on the
floor. I wanted to tell Doctor whose translation it was but could not find the book."
"Sebastopol" troubled him also—whether "opal" or "opol." We looked for and finally
found the book. "Frank D. Millet: it seems to me I know something about
him—but what, what?"
Insisted that I take the book. I wrote the name of the translator on a sheet of paper which
he carefully laid aside. He then composed himself in his chair and looked for a long time at
the frontispiece portrait of Tolstoy. "It is a wonderful powerful head: I
have seen such heads: dynamic—crowded with character." Then: "Some day look about in the print stores or among the art
dealers—find me a good portrait of Tolstoy: get two— I will take and pay
for one: I wish to have it about me here."
"This book is far, far, far—threefold,
fourfold—beyond anything I have seen before from Tolstoy. From reading it, from
hearing your reasons, from the man Black's articles in Unity—new lighs are thrown on
him: I find tangible indications of to me heretofore only half-suspected powers: mainly by
your strong statement and this book: the whole, compacted, compating, judgment: ascending:
up—up—up and out"—trying to illustrate it with his hands. "Oh! he has immensely risen—immensely!" He "fully realized" the "grandeur" of T.'s
methods—"his planting himself on certain
facts—redoubtable facts."
"The wonder to me is, that those characters emerge from extremest social
conditions—the conditions of all others we would think little likely to produce
them: from the most tyrannical social forces in Europe. Think of Turgenieff: I often talked of
him with Gurowski—my family friend there in Washington—one of the clearest
headed most remarkable men I ever came in contact with. Gurowski was very irascible at times,
but when at his best, when on good humor, he was keen,
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 382]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
cordial,
happy, as men rarely are." Yet G. came of "just such hard
conditions": his movements were "a puzzle to his friends
abroad": "loudly condemned, he suffered for it." A pause. "The whole genius of this Russian power—the writers: Tolstoy,
Turgenieff: Kennan's exile—has been a wonder, in some respects a delight, to me. I
have been a personal witness of much in the same direction in Gurowski: and by the way,"
he said, after a slight pause—"in your travels about in the
second-hand stores—in Leary's (which I know to be a very good one)—in
Dave's—you 'll some day come across a book of
Turgenieff's—Dave maybe can tell you about it—Sketches of Sporting
Life—something of that sort: get it for me—get it, read it, let us read
it: I will pay for it. I have heard of it somewhere—have long desired it: but
somehow it escapes me."
"Did you notice," W. asked later on—"Did you notice Doctor speaks in that letter I gave you"—Dec. 21st—"speaks of the big book again?—calls it grand?"
"What is the secret of the growth of the fame of L. of G.?" W.
said: "It seems the merest accident: an accepter here and there: an
accepter quite accidentally generated: how, wherefore, who can declare?" He spoke of the
original fight over it—"the efforts to keep it upon its
feet"—"even now acquiesced in by a scarce circle."
Bucke's allusion to immortality in his letter interested W. "Did you
notice what the Doctor said?"
"Does the Doctor go with you the whole way?"
"I think Bucke fully acquiesces: Bucke is Oriental—has an
Oriental religiosity—a firm fixed notion of some sort." How then about W. W.
himself? "I mostly conclude I do—mostly: yet there are times
when I ask myself very seriously—do you or do you not?" I said: "Donaldson asked me about it when he was over."
"Did he? What did you say?" I explained: "I
said to him what I have been saying to others—and a good many have been asking me
lately—that I believed you always accepted while never dogmatizing about it." W.
exclaimed: "Good! good! that
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 383]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
was just about
the right word: I guess I do: indeed, I do without a guess: but many folks say I do not and I
suppose I myself waver at times—always however coming round to the affirmation at
last." Told me of a Boston man, "a scholarly, leisurely
man—a friend" who had "frequently" looked him up on
his last trip to Boston—"the Leaves of Grass
Trip"—and "debated the point with" him or "before" him—for he himself would "never debate."
"H was in a curious train of thought: perverse, stubborn: yet was a man
of intelligence—meant to be honest. He asserted to me time and again that I did not
believe: quoted me lines from Leaves of Grass—'here—here—here—here—how do you explain this?' I
would ask: 'How do you get that?' and he would say: 'Here they
are—here they are': would himself have the most distorted
versions—would find it hard to understand: even my explanations were mostly futile:
text and all confessedly brought together in his hurly-burly head." It had been "a great lesson" to him. "I regard it as a study,
a curio: instructive: it demonstrated by what a thin thread a writer hold his prestige: by the
accident here and there of somebody understanding—in any case oftener
misunderstanding—you. This man was a fair sample of the critics as critics go, good
and bad (mostly bad)."
As we sat there talking Ed brought in a card—a reporter's card—a fellow I
knew well and whom W. knew when I explained who he was: connected with The Record. W. put on
his glasses: read the name off deliberately— "Charles
[something] Bacon"—repeating it several times as if to job up his memory. "I indistinctly remember him. tell him to come up—stay a minute:
tell him I am sick—that he is to stay only briefly." Then as Ed was about to go:
"Put a chair there"—motioning towards the foot of the bed.
Bacon shortly came in—shook hands: W. saying some few welcoming words and inviting B.
to take the chair. B. explained that he had been sent by The Record to find out how W. had
spent his Christmas. W. thence-
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 384]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
forward affable—full, free,
communicative. W. said: "I have had but no letters you would call
important"—adding after a laugh—"strange to say,
some of them from young ladies: the young ladies are most faithful to me nowadays. I had one
letter from New York, one from Connecticut—several others: young ladies who for some
reason or other have followed me up—grown up under my wing: young ladies or about to
become." Spoke of his confinement—of his "half
paralyzed" condition. "It is now almost twenty years. Do you know
what hemiplegia is? In my case it started here"—pressing his finger to the back
of his neck—"then came down the whole side—arm, leg,
face: the leg never recovered: the arm recovered quickly. Luckily the stroke did not affect,
such as it is, my power of speech, or my brain: up to the time of the present attack I was
able to work—to write, read—as any time before: only my power to locomote,
to get about, was gone—or partly gone."
"My bete noir," he said, "is indigestion."
But "the last two or three days" he had "in all
respects" felt "wonderfully" bettered—"better, clearer of active trouble, than for five months past." Spoke
of himself as "leaning towards gain": said his books were "off" his "hands, so to speak"—"done, or as good as done": the vols. "not
actually here," but "some of them" here, and all the sheets with
the binder. Advised the visitor to remember him to "all the boys." He
assured B. he "always" had "warning" of the
attacks. "Thanks to my dear father and mother, I have been wonderfully
fortunate in my constitution—my body." He was "gifted with
cheer" and that was "certainly worth more than five or ten thousand
dollars a year." ""By nature, by observation, by the doctors, I have
learned that the thing to do when I am down is to rely upon the
vis,
as
it is called—the inherited forces: to lay low—attempt
nothing—rest—recuperate: if the
vis
comes to the
rescue—meets the peril—well and good: then for another lease! But if it
does not, then all may as well be given up at once." He did not know—"it
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 385]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
is not at all certain"—but "I may go from this out upon my ordinary condition of the past seventeen
years." B. asked W.'s age. "I am in my seventieth
year—celebrated the end of the sixty-ninth the last of May, this year." Then he
added with what I told him was "cocky confidence": "If you can, come around next May: I will post you on points you might wish
to know—which you can use or not as you choose." B. asked about W.'s "outings." But W. shook his head: "I have
none—I have not been out for seven months: I can scarcely get from this chair to the
door there unassisted—must help myself with a chair, the table,
anything—sometimes calling the nurse." Did the cold weather hurt him? "Oh no! not in the slightest—no days could have been better for
me than the last three or four." The hot days were the trying ones. "If I am still about when summer comes I must look up another place—get away
somewhere."
Bacon left. W. very free with reporters, sometimes quickly dispatching them or will not see
them at all. Likes them. Sometimes is very communicative, as to-day.
Room terrifically hot. "In time of peace prepare for war," he said,
as Eddy came in the room with a big armful of wood. I said: "Ed seems
to be the right fellow for you here: he suits you to a t." He nodded: "Yes: he is vital, easy, nochalant, self sufficient (in the right sense):
he throws out a sort of sane atmosphere: I always find myself at home, at peace, with
him." W. is always willing I should take along with me the scraps of things which he starts
to throw away. He "can't see what the devil" I care for "the written stuff," as he calls it. "Still—I must humor you," he says. He gave me to-night another of his letters from Washington to Hugo in New York. "I want you some day to write, to talk, about me: to tell what I mean by
Calamus: to make no fuss but to speak out of your own knowledge: these letters will help you:
they will clear up some things which have been misunderstood: you know what: I don't need to
say. The world is so topsy turvy,
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 386]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
so afraid to love, so afraid to
demonstrate, so good, so respectable, so aloof, that when it sees two people or more people
who really, greatly, wholly care for each other and say so—when they see such people
they wonder and are incredulous or suspicious or defamatory, just as if they had somehow been
the victims of an outrage." He paused. Then: "For instance, any
demonstration between men—any: it is always misjudged: people come to conclusions
about it: they know nothing, there is nothing to be known; nothing except what might just as
well be known: yet they shake their wise heads—they meet, gossip, generate slander:
they know what is not to be known—they see what is not to be seen: so they confide
in each other, tell the awful truth: the old women men, the old men women, the guessers, the
false-witnesses—the whole caboodle of liars and fools." I said to W.: "That 's eloquent enough for Congress and true
enough for the Bible!" He shook his fist at me: "What do you know
about either, anyhow?" I read him the Hugo letter but had a deuce of a time getting
through, it was so criss-crossed and interlined. But I finally worked it out. W. helped me here
and there. He said: "You 're a better sleuth
than I am: I find it impossible to go through some of my devious old drafts of letters
myself." I read. There was no date on the letter. I asked W.: "Can
you give a date?" He said: "I think it was in '63—about
the same time as the other."
My honest thanks to you, Hugo for your letter posting me up not only about yourself but
about my dear boys, Fred, Nat Bloom—always so welcome to hear personally or in any
way any and every item about them. Dear friend, the same evening I received your letter I
saw in the New York papers (which I get here about 5 every evening) the announcement of
Charles Chauncey's death. When I went up to my room that night towards 11 I took a seat by
the open window in the splendid soft moonlit night and, there alone by myself, I devoted,
(as is my custom sometimes under such
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 387]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
circumstances) to the dead
boy the silent cheerful tribute of an hour or so of floating thought about him, and whatever
rose up from the thought of him—his looks, his handsome face, his hilarious fresh
ways, his sunny smile, his voice, his blonde hair, his talk, his caprices—the way
he and I first met—how we spoke together impromptu, no introduction—then
our easy falling into intimacy—he with his affectionate heart thought so well of
me, and I loved him then, and love him now—I thought over our meetings together,
our drinks and groups so friendly, our suppers with Fred and Charley Russell &c. off
by ourselves at some table, at Pfaff's off the other end. O how charming those early times,
adjusting our friendship, I to the three others, although it needed little
adjustment—for I believe we all loved each other more than we
supposed—Chauncey was frequently the life and the soul of these
gatherings—was full of sparkle, and so good, really witty—then for an
exception he would have a mood come upon him and right after the outset of our party, he
would grow still and cloudy and up and unaccountably depart—but these were
seldom—then I got to having occasionally quite a long walk with him, only us two,
and then he would talk well and freely about himself, his experiences, feelings, quite
confidential, &c. All these I resumed, sitting by myself. Hugo, that 's the way I sat there Wednesday night till after midnight (the pleasant
Virginia breeze coming up the Potomac) and certainly without that they call mourning thought
of the boy. That 's often my little way of celebrating the death
of my friends.
Dear Hugo, you speak of your all remembering me and wish to see me, it would be happiness
for me to be with you all, at one of your friendly meetings, especially at Fred's room, so
pleasant, with its effect I remember of pictures, fine color, &c. to have the
delight of my dear boys' company and their gayety and electricity, their precious
friendship, the talk and laughter, the drinks, me surrounded by you all (so I will for a
moment fancy myself) tumbled
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 388]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
upon by you all, with all sorts of
kindness, smothered with you all in you hasty thoughtless magnificent way, overwhelmed with
questions, Walt this, Walt that, and Walt everything. Ah if one could float off to New York
this afternoon. It is Sunday afternoon now, and perhaps you are at this moment gathered at
Fred's or at your house, and having a good time.
I suppose you were at Charles Chauncey's funeral—tell me about it and all
particulars about his death. When you write tell.
I looked up as I finished reading. Walt's eyes were full of tears. He wiped the tears away
with the sleeve of his coat. Put on a make-believe chuckle. "It 's very beautiful, Walt: right on the ground: where the people are."
"I hope so: that 's where I belong: right on
the ground." W. added: "Emerson said when we were out together in
New York and Boston—said it more than once: 'I envy you
your capacity for being at home with anybody in any crowd.' Then he asked me on another
occasion: 'Don't you fear now and then that your freedom, your
ease, your nonchalance, with men may be misunderstood?' I asked him: 'Do you
misunderstand it?' He put his hand on my arm and said: 'No: I see
it for what it is: it is beautiful.' Then I said to him: 'Misunderstood? Yes: it will be
misunderstood. But what is there I do that is not misunderstood?' He smiled in his sweet
gentle way and murmured: 'True! true!'"
|
|
|