|
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 419]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
Sunday, December
30, 1888.
8 P. M. W. on the bed. Very good day. Visitors few. Doctor not in. Inquiries by Miss Hunter.
Harned came awhile. Nobody else. W. quite communicative. "I consider this
on the whole a good week—freer, easier, calmer than for some time: while not agile
not boisterous I never experience that strange sinking, giving away, in the head, I did
formerly. I can write, I can read—I am getting a little stronger: it is in that
direction I most suffer now—the want of strength." Said he had been busy all
day. Some mail this evening, though little. "I got The Critic: tried to
read it: but it was decidedly dry." I asked: "Even The
Lounger?" He laughed: "I forgot that: you mean the tariff
talk?—the aim of actors to put a tariff on companies contracted for abroad?" It
was "outrageous," he said: "outrageous"" it
was "nothing but restriction—restriction."
"Consistently carried out the tariff would close our ports
absolutely," he said: "and do now, in fact: abolish America itself."
But it has struck me that the whole noise this time is the work of a wag. Can it be?" Was
"glad to see" that there were "some who
objected to be classified with reactionaries: Jefferson, Florence, for example."
W. received a copy of Long Islander containing a marked paragraph acknowledging the book sent
the editor. Was this to go to Dr. Bucke? "No—I guess not: it is
but a trifle: I send the paper off every week to an old sea captain." Bucke spoke in one
of his letters of Parkman's histories. W. said: "I never read
them—not one of them:yet by all accounts they are set down as being strong and
fascinating." He had "never met Parkman"—in fact, knew
"little about him." Sanborn discussed. W.: "I
have a good picture of him here somewhere: I will hunt it up for you. Did you never see
Sanborn? He has a striking
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 420]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
face. Perhaps you have seen Emerson. No?
Well, Frank looks like Emerson: a fine face, a fresh eye, plenty of hair,
black—tall,slim. He is always exceedingly cordial: and Mrs. Sanborn too: I like her
too: they have a couple of fine children-sixteen, eighteen, or twenty." W. had "been there"—had always been "nobly
received." Spoke of Mrs. S. as "a typical New England woman."
Then referred to Mrs. O'Connor—"true, tender—also a
New England woman: bright, intellectual dyspeptic, the mother of two children: not so cherry
as before: she lost both children: a little boy—brought with them when they came to
Washington: did I ever tell you about it? the time was unfortunate: the smallpox was very
prevalent there then: the early years of the War: everybody was crazy with the idea of
inoculation: crazy, beset, dogmatic: in this current the child went down—had been
inoculated: sickened, then died, in that strange way: the other child, the girl, living on to
her twenty-second year: that is, until three or four years ago." At this point I broke to
W. the news of the death of Morse's mother. "It came a week or more ago
when you were not so well: I thought it best then not to speak of it." He asked: "What? the good mother we have heard so much about?" And he added after
a pause: "So she is dead? she is dead? How often Sidney spoke of
her." Called her "the grand Roman mother." I asked: "What's the matter with her being the grand American mother?" W.
looked sharply at me: "Yes Horace: the grand American mother: sure
enough: we don't have to go back to Rome for our mothers: the grand American mother: is there
anything beyond being that?" He would write Morse. Spoke tenderly: "How greatly the making of America belongs to the personality of its mothers-the ever
faithful, ever earnest, ever strong, ever brave!"
I had Tolstoy's My Confession with me. I gave it to him. He rose from the bed—went
to the chair with my assistance. "I have Oldach's check made out: I want
to give it to you." Sat in the chair. Handled the Tolstoy.
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 421]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
"I will read it—at least skim it: I doubt if so closely,
absorbingly, as Sebastopol." I spoke of Tolstoy's verbal simplicity: this book was in the
same style: "never an assault on the reader, attempting sensational
effects"—adding: "I think a great many of the writers
must calculate, how will this affect the reader?" W. said: ""No
doubt of it: all of them: nearly all of them: as I put it, of malic prepense." I asked: "Is n't it true of the masters, that they are
incapable of such calculation?" W. said: "Yes: undoubtedly yes."
Handed me a check for Oldach: thirty-four dollars and eighty-six cents. Then said: "Was there another? did n't you speak of
another?" I indicated Adams' bill for plate printing. He took his check book, kept wrapped
in brown paper on the table: "I guess I'll make it out now while I 'm in the humor." When handed to me: "That
closes us all out? Our skirts are clear now?" This pays every bill.
"Do you want this?" he asked, handing me a sheet from the table. "It is the manuscript of the Note at Beginning: I rescued it from the wood
box for you." I protested against his profligacy in threatening to throw such treasures
away. He was jolly over it. "Well—there
's lots more here prepared to follow it!" I kicked. "Lets's
make a swop: I'll furnish paper for the fire if you 'll give me the
manuscripts!" He cried: "That 's a square
offer, sure enough. We 'll see—we
'll see!" Bucke refers every now and then in his letters to his own probably early
death. W.:"Yes: I notice the Doctor makes such allusions, but it is in a
distant sort of a way—the second, third, fourth, even fifth remove." What was
Bucke's age? He did not know. Seemed to think it odd. "I can't even come
a good guess when he was born: Maurice must be forty-five, fifty, years—thereabouts.
I wonder?" I inquired of W. concerning Pease recently here. Weston met him at the last
Contemporary meeting: had come there (Pease had come) in a flannel shirt: talked well,
candidly. He spoke to Weston of W. as "the greatest man in the United States
to-day."
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 422]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
Weston discovered that he was a man of means—devoted
himself to Socialism: came to this country, went to work in the shops: started propagandism,
was discharged. W. listened to the story intently. Said as to the reference to himself: "Well, he
is
crazy, sure!" Then: "Yes, I recall him: of course: he is a Socialist: it seems as though all
the square round fellows were getting to be Socialists: sometimes, I think, I feel almost
sure, Socialism is the next thing coming: I shrink from it in some ways: yet it looks like our
only hope. I 'm a sort of an anarchist tramp, too: and you? well, you
are a lot like me (or am I like you?): but things drive us on—the God damned
robbers, fools, stupids, who ride their gay horses over the bodies of the crowd: they drive us
on : God knows to what: sometimes I don't like to think of it: but they
'll drive us into an inevitable resentment, then revolt, of some sort. The prospect of
it all would make me shudder if I did n't know that something must
happen—that we can't push on much farther in this direction. Horace, you 'll be in the thick of the fight after I 'm
gone: my days are few: but you have years ahead—years of vicissitude—of
active agitation: you are one of the rebels: you will have to take your part in the fight. God
bless you whatever you do! I know that what you do for yourself, for others, in those days
you 'll also do for me. God bless you!"
As to the article from Falconer in The Critic: "Stevenson appears to be
famous: all the things of the world that go to make a man famous seem to be his: I confess I
do not enthuse in the slightest degree myself." On the table Consuelo. He had been
repairing the loose covers: "I find after all I have the volumes
complete: five of them: three of the story proper: two of the sequel—the Countess of
Rudolstadt." He had said to me in the summer that he was afraid one was missing. "I have had the books—or my mother—I think since
'41-nearly fifty years. This is the best translation: there is no other approaching it: it is
by George William Curtis' wife's father—George
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 423]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
Francis
Shaw. I have always treasured it: read, read, read-never tiring. The book is a masterpiece:
truly a masterpiece: the noblest work left by George Sand—the noblest in many
respects, on its own field, in all literature." He desired that I should take and read it.
"I can say it almost has an historic preciousness to me, now I have had
it so long. It is very decrepit—the sheets often loose, ready to drop out. I have
been minded to bind it—so to preserve it, if there could be any great object in
that." W. is sensitive as to translations. His first question as to My Confession was, "Who translated it?" No name on the title page. He hoped "not Dole." After we had shaken hands and I was departing (I stood in
the doorway leading to Ed's room where he sat reading a paper) W. called out:"Oh! I did n't tell you: Tom brought me The
Tribune to—day: I read much in it—among other things a review of
Richardson's American Literature. Richardson brings me in. It seems he has made quite a
discovery: he makes much of it: the reviewer uses it as if to say, that is so,
very
so: namely-that I distinctly confess a
spiritual
failure—do not know spirit at all—outrage it: in fact am
grossly material etc., etc." I said: Well, that
was
a great discovery, was n't it?"
"Oh! very great—a surprising discovery." I said again: "But don't you remember O'Connor's friend in the summer who said you were
all
spirit?"
"Yes I remember: I thought he, I now others, made too much, far too much,
of that point." Then turning back to the critique: "The reviewer
evidently wants to make much of it!" He had sent the paper off to Bucke by the evening
mail. I spoke of purchasing a copy. "I would not: it is not worth the
time: I read it all—read it word for word: but it did not pay me. The type was good,
the columns broad: I was in fine humor. It was absolutely flat—had absolutely
nothing in it: much, much, much worse than Sanborn's piece on Emerson and Hawthorne, which,
while having no weight, was still worth reading."
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 424]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
I heard this in a play: "a walking shadow ending in nothing." W. asked me: "Don't you like it? 'ending in nothing': how fine that is: that is the
review." Again: "Most of these book reviews so-called are echoes of
echoes: the fellows don't seem to have a bit of originality: they run after each other like
sheep: one says a thing: then the other says a thing: then they chorus together—the
whole kit and crew: they say, one, two, three, damn so and so: they say, four, five, six, save
so and so: that 's the way they proceed: like so many monkeys on the
limb of a tree chattering in concert."
"You don't feel that they are all so?"
"No—not at all: all but the exceptions: there are exceptions.
Emerson was quite vigorous in talking about the critics—talking with me: he said: 'I seem to mystify them—rather mystify than antagonize
them': which I guess was true. I seem to make them mad—rile them: I mystify
them, too, but they don't know it: they only know I am vile, indecent, perverted, adulterous.
Bryant was very nice to me generally: he seemed to follow my history somewhat—knew
about me: he thought I had 'the whole wolf pack' on my heels and he would
say again: 'As you have challenged the whole world I don't suppose you are
surprised or resentful when you find the whole world out against you with its hounds.' It
did not seem to me that Bryant was wrong: what else could I have expected? When John Morley
came to see me that time he made some remark of this same tenor. 'Criticism has isolated you here in America,' Morley said; which was true: but it would
also have been true to say: 'You have isolated yourself.' I am not a squealer: I don't think
that a man has any call to go out breaking heads and expect the people he attacks to bless him
for it: in a case like mine it 's give and take: after I 'm on right foundations no opposition can upset me: if I am falsely rooted nothing
can save me."
No day passes now but W. hands me over some document which he says is for my "archives." I
said to-night to him: "You are giving me some great stuff nowadays: I
will find
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 425]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
real use for it: I'll make a big story out of it all some
day." He nodded: "That 's what I want you
to do if the world will stand it. In the final sense they are not records of my
life—of my personal life—of Walt Whitman—but scripture material
applying to a movement in which I am only an episode." He had laid out one of his rough
drafts of letters. This was for Conway. The envelope (Attorney General's office) was written up
by W. Letter sent to M. D. Conway, Feb. 17, 1868. Left
N.Y. probably 19th Feb. reach'd England probably 3d March." I
read letter aloud.
Feb. 17th, 1868.
Dear Conway:
Your letter of Feb 1st has just come to hand. I am willing that Mr. Hotten should sell his
English publication of my Poems in the United States, on condition of paying me one shilling
for every copy disposed of here, and hereby give consent to that arrangement. Furthermore,
to save trouble, I hereby fully empower you to decide or act for me, in any matters or
propositions relating to the book, in England, should any such arise—and what you
agree to, is agreed to by me. If convenient I should like Mr. Hotten to send me two copies
of the book, by mail, immediately. I should also consider it a special favor if you would
forward me from time to time any of the English magazines or journals that might contain
noteworthy
criticisms of my poems. But you must allow me to repay you
the favor.
William O'Connor is well and remains employed as before. Ellen O'Connor is absent, in
Providence, but returns here soon—their little girl has been very ill, is now
convalescent.
Our American politics, as you notice, are in an unusually effervescent condition, with,
perhaps (to the mere eye observation, from a distance)—divers alarming and deadly
portending stars and signals:—Yet we old stagers take things very easily, and
count on coming out all right in due time. The Republicans have exploited the negro too
intensely, and there comes a reaction. But that is going to
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 426]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
be
provided for. According to present appearances the good, worthy, non-demonstrative
courage-representing Grant will be elected President. What about him, then? As at present
advised I shall vote for him, non-demonstrative as he is—but admit I can tell much
better about him some five years hence.
I remain well in health—occupy the same agreeable quiet place in the Attorney
General's office—and am writing a prose piece or two (which I will send you when
printed). I wish to send my sincerest thanks and personal regards to Mr. Rossetti. To have
had my book and my cause fall into his hands, in London, in the way they have, I consider
one of the greatest pieces of good fortune.
Mr. Morley called upon me. Did you get my piece I sent—Democracy?—I
have just received a letter from A. B. Alcott—he was with Emerson the previous
evening, talking.
Remember my request to Mr. Hotten for a couple of copies by mail—also, by your
own kindness, any English criticisms of value, should such appear.
I have not yet seen the February Fortnightly, nor the book William Blake, but shall
procure and read both. I feel prepared in advance to render my cordial and admirant respect
to Mr. Swinburne—and would be glad to have him know that I thank him heartily for
the mention that he has made of me, in the Blake.
Indeed, my dear friend, I may here confess to you that to be accepted by these young men
of England, and treated with highest courtesy and even honor, touches me deeply. In my own
country, so far,—from the press, and from authoritative quarters, I have received
but one long tirade of impudence, mockery, and scurrilous jeers. Only since the English
recognition have the skies here lightened up a little.
With remembrance and love, to you, Rossetti, and all my good friends—I write for
the present Farewell.
I said to W.:"That was the time when you and Swinburne were
coquetting."
"Coquetting, do you call it?
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 427]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
There was damned
little coquetting from this side: I took Swinburne at his word—that was all when he
said, 'I want to be your friend' I acquiesced: what else could I have done? I think John would
rather I had said, you don't belong to me and I don't belong to you, and shown him the door.
How could I have done that?" W. also said: "You remember I gave you
the Conway letter introducing Morley: I don't know whether I said then that Morley called. He
did: we had a friendly talk: he was not effusive but he made it plain that he had not come
merely out of the idle curiosity: there was an underlying interest (shall I say affection,
too? maybe: maybe not) evident in his manner. The reference to Alcott's evening with Emerson
will take you back to the Alcott letter in which he tells of it—of that visit. Oh
Horace, these are all records of long ago—of times, places, persons: I was then in
the struggle—fought desperately for my life. Now the strenuous first battle is over:
I am no longer in the rushing current: I sit here contemplating as an observer what I was
formerly in the midst of as an actor. But some matters have come my way, too: the storm has
not gone altogether contrary: has brought me comfort here and there—an intimation of
ultimate victory."
|
|
|