|
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 550]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
Thursday, January
17, 1889.
7.25 P. M. W. reading by gaslight: not looking over-joyful. Yet serene. Voice, vigor, not so
marked as yesterday. Talked freely while I stayed. How was he? "I find
little—in fact no—change: I am so-so: no more: am passing days now, one
like another, little varying, all monotonous. I don't seem to be getting worse—or
better, either, for that matter: indeed, may be getting a little weaker—slowly,
slowly." Then he laughed quietly: "But the Doctor does not
come—has not been here in days: and that may be a good sign—at least we
will interpret it that way." Spoke of having "dipped into"
Holmes' Emerson, saying: "I think it will interest me." And again: "I find I am like to be moved, at least a little, by it." I referred to
Holmes as "chirpy"—and W. after a slight pleasant laugh
said: "Yes, he is that?" Had he ever met H.? "I
have seen him: I met him once in the Old Corner Book Store."
"In Boston?"
"Yes—in Boston." When?
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 551]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
Here he
was a little puzzled. "I don't know if I can say that positively: perhaps
in '61, over the Thayer and Eldridge proofs: or in '81, with the Osgoods: probably '81":
but could not "settle that with" himself. But he clearly remembered
"the old book store: Holmes was there: we said a few words: probably
words of no consequence, no purport." But did H. take any stock in W.? "No! oh no! I guess, not a bit. How could he? Still, I don't know much
about it." He thought H. "a considerable man of his
kind"—but "a man alien to our ideals."
"I think Sidney stumped him most—Sidney Morse. Morse some years
ago secured sittings from Holmes for a bust—afterward sent to London: done in Parian
marble, spoiled (all smoothed out) in the process. Sidney is brave: he always stands up for
the colors: he is equipped—knows. Sidney told me much about their talks together: he
out and out telling Holmes once that he did not know enough to talk on that
subject—enough about me: that he should go back to the books, learn
more—something of that purport." I said: "We should dare
the gods occasionally, especially when they nod." W. responded heartily. No one who has
not heard him talk can imagine the feeling he sometimes puts into expressions of endorsement
that read almost commonplacely. He cried: "Yes we should! Yes we
should!"
I quoted Parker who spoke of God's duties to man as well as man's duty to God. W. said he had
not heard that before: "They must have regarded it as rank
blasphemy." Bryant up. I asked W. some questions. "Did Bryan
appreciate your position—your work?" I asked the same question the other day.
Now W. said unhesitatingly: "I hardly think so: Bryant was built up of
the Pope and Dryden school." I interrupted: "But you think he was
greater than either?" W.: "I did not mean that he was just like
them, but that he was trained in that school: he was in fact greater than
either—ever so much more human and moving: but Bryant never could have appreciated
the facts we have stood for." Reading Frank Leslie's to-day
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 552]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
again. This and The Stage seem to be the only papers he thoroughly
looks into. He asked me about the book. When I said: "Nothing: we only
have to wait"—he nodded and said: "Yes: and for my part I
have little anxiety on the subject." Still, he wants "to see it
done, well done, for others if not for me." Said he had letters from Rhys and Bucke, "neither of them of the slightest interest."
"Rhys is still in London, floating about there, mainly engaged with the
Walter Scott Company."
No visitors to-day. Saw a photo on the table. I picked it
up—said warm things about it: unmounted: four by six or eight inches: showing W.
about fifty-five. Waited for me to get through. Then: "So you like it? I
don't know but it is good: I came upon it to-day." He has been
looking up old portraits—the Doyle one of them. "If I strike
another you shall have it. O'Connor has a copy—at least, he had one—I
suppose has it still. He liked it—if I am not much mistaken liked it much." Who
took it? He could not remember. "It was one of the great New York
fellows." Tried to hit on the name. No, it would not come. "I think
it must have been taken fully twenty years ago: I cannot recite all the details: it was while
I was working—was in Washington—on one of my trips up—my flying
trips." I said he seemed to lend himself to the camera—that he seemed to come
naturally by good photos. He accounted for "the occasional success"
by other reasons. In the first place, he thought "many of the photos
failures anyhow—some indifferently good, some radically bad."
"It is, I am convinced, in the main from other
circumstances—rather in this, that I don't fix up when I go to have the picture
taken: they tell me nearly everybody does: that is a great item." But I persisted: "Anyhow, even if you did fix yourself up, you would make an
impression." He laughed heartily. "I see you will have it so: but
there are difficulties, too—my red, florid, blooded, complexion—my gray
dull eyes—don't consort well together: they require different trimmings: it is very
hard
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 553]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
to adjust the camera to both." He had an eye, he said, "not searching, not moving." I called "quietude" the habitual humor of his pictures. He was struck by the word. "How do you mean it?" Then instancing Hunter: "He
has a piercing black eye which is always telling, effective: take him when is thoroughly
interested, awake, earnest: there are many fine glows to his eye—like the fleeting
lights of the sky, the water of the lake." But: "Startle,
strikingness, brilliancy, are not factors in my appearance—not a touch of them. As
for me I think the greatest aid is in my
insouciance
—my utter
indifference: my going as if it meant nothing unusual—happening in."
I suggested that we might some day have a W. gallery—a book giving W.'s
portraits—lots—all—of them. In the midst of this W. suddenly
exclaimed: "I have it: Brady! Brady!" I knew at once this was the
name he had lost: so I said: "Your memory generally brings you out
right in the end." But he objected: "No—it 's not that: but what you have just said brought into my mind certain hours, talks
of the old times—with them Brady's name." Afterwards he explained: "Brady had galleries in Washington: his headquarters were in New York. We
had many a talk together: the point was, how much better it would often be, rather than having
a lot of contradictory records by witnesses or historians—say of Cæsar,
Socrates, Epictetus, others—if we could have three or four or half a dozen
portraits—very accurate—of the men: that would be history—the
best history—a history from which there could be no appeal." I asked: "Was that Brady's notion?" W. said: "No: mine,
I suppose: I suppose I spun that out—reeled it off: but I know that we discussed
it—that it was occasioned by conversations we had together."
"Brady made many fine pictures," W. thought: "he had the notion to produce the heads of celebrés: he had quite a collection: he
must have had not a few dozen merely but hundreds and hundreds. I remember some of them: there
was one of Cooper: I liked it very much: oh! it was very
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 554]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
good! I
have seen engravings from it since: one of Irving, too: and the women: the women in society
there at Washington: Presidents' wives, and so on, so on"—naming several. How
about Lincoln? Had he a good Lincoln? "No not one: at least, not one
good." W. half remembered a Lincoln—"perhaps more than
one"—"of a sort"—but none effective. "He should have had: Lincoln was very obliging: whenever he could he would
make it convenient."
W. resumed after a brief stop: "But there never has been a portrait of
Lincoln—never a real portrait: there were certain ones of us agreed on that."
Why? What was the reason? "I could not tell: none of us could: all we
knew was, it was not there: had we seen it, had it been there, we should have been mighty
happy, you can well believe." He spoke of Lincoln's "wonderful
reserve, restraint, of expression—fine nobility staring at you out of all that
ruggedness": this had never been "stated pictorially." He did
not know why his friend Alexander Gardner "did not try his hands at
it," for G. was "very successful: I have often thought him the
best." Darwin, too. He was named. "I have never seen a good portrait
of Darwin." How did W. like the old daguerreotypes? "I have seen
wonderful specimens: they are not to be sneezed at." But the modern photo is certainly an
improvement? "Oh! I suppose so: they are more
convenient—cheaper: better in all ways probably."
I had the Willis life in the American Men of Letters series. Would he like to read it? He "guessed" not. "I am not much interested in
Willis: he was a good natured bright fellow: I met him: he had a certain run of success."
Described Willis as "one of the particular men"—"the horror of photographers." W. inimitable: "Willis had his topknot: this had to be got into the pictures: if it was this side when it
should have been that, that when this, then good-bye picture!" W. tried to illustrate with
his own thin hair but it would not work: very comical, however. I had a couple of Boston
pictures of Morse in my pocket. W. was
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page figure 012]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 555]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
eager to see them—actually seized them out of my hands:
and he regarded them for a long time with an evident relish. "Oh Horace
they are beautiful: O, they are our Sidney! They fill me with a certain sort of awe: he is the
noblest Roman of them all—of us all: who goes farther, who goes deeper, than Sidney?
Who more loves? Who gives up more? Who is so willing to let others succeed and stand back
himself—so ready to help them succeed and stand back? Sidney is full of genius: he
rides at the front: he says the first and last words: he is like the still waters that run
deep. Oh! as I look at these pictures I see him here still: his quiet quizzical wholesome
ways: working in the yard back there with his clay: downstairs—cocking his head
(getting a line on me) then rushing back to the head again giving it another touch or two. It
all comes back: and the evenings, too, in the dim light: the talks: his gentle
voice—sometimes his loving hand which he would lay on me." W. stopped. Then: "Some day we must have him back with us again: some day, some day."
W. gave me another one of the "avowals." He said: "It is a beautiful
thing after being denied so long to be accepted in such a spirit." I had to read the
letter to him of course.
35 E. 39th Street, New York, May 3, 1876.
Mr. Whitman,
Dear Sir:
My friend and yours Mr. Joaquin Miller tells me that the
best way to gratify a long cherished wish of mine,
i. e.
, to have a
complete edition of your poems, is to write to you directly for a copy of them. I therefore
follow his advice. If you will write your own name on the fly leaf of the volumes, it will
be a great favor to me and most highly appreciated.
I was one of the earliest readers of your Leaves of Grass, that unique book, which so
startled the many and so delighted the few. Permit me to congratulate you and to
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Begin page 556]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
| |
feel a little pride myself as an American that you have received
such abundant recognition from the greatest men of our age both abroad and at home; and when
I remember your work during our dreadful War, my heart as well as my pride is touched, and I
cannot though a stranger to you forbear presenting to the
true man
, a
nobler title even than that of the true poet, my profoundest respect and admiration. With
sincere regard yours
Laura Curtis Bullard.
W. seemed doubtful about "the abundant recognition."
"A few here and there—a handful: are there more? I am not
worrying over what I could not get: but I am not willing to figure as a petted darling of the
great and the powerful." I said: "She don't say you are popular,
Walt: she only says the
great
men of this and other countries have
recognized you. Do you deny that?" He said: "That
's hardly for me to say: who are the great, anyhow?" I broke in: "Walt, you almost seem to resent the idea of success." He shook his
head: "No—it 's not that: I am not
afraid of getting the success or of being spoiled by it."
"Well, Walt—take this woman herself: I don't know who she is,
but she sounds pretty big to me: you feel proud of yourself as the man she addresses in that
way, don't you?" W. then: "Oh! don't think I don't appreciate such
things—all such things: why, I live on them—they are all I have: cut them
out and I am landed high and dry. No—I only kick about the popularity idea. Every
now and then some one comes along and says: Walt, I don't see that your shoe pinches! Of
course he don't. But I do: I wear the shoe: I feel the pinch." Then after a break: "Yes: God bless her! God bless her!"
|
|
|